Cultural tourism, where people travel in order to visit museums, monuments and archaeological sites among other things, is a growing industry. Having so many visitors may sometimes benefit a nation’s cultural heritage, but can also cause problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
With inexpensive flight fares in today's society, people can easily travel to various places around the world. The more they travel, the more they want to know about other countries' cultures. There are advantages and disadvantages though. This essay will focus on why cultural tourism can benefit nations' cultural heritage and at the same time can also be problematic.
First of all, tourism is a big profit center. When travelling, most people spend more than they usually do at home. This can lead to major improvements of local businesses which can in turn help maintain cultural heritage including archaeological sites financially since these are the main attractions to tourists. Moreover, when a nation's cultural heritage sites get more recognised internationally, there will be more support to protect and maintain them including both local and international.
On the contrary, big influxes of tourists can cause serious environmental problems. Without strict regulations, tourists normally pay very little attention to the importance of the conservation of environment where they travel. For example, Thailand as one of the most famous tourist destinations is suffering heavy air pollution due to the significant increases in the number of road vehicles. As a matter of fact, such a problem can only be handled properly when governments seriously take into account balancing tourism development and its sustainability.
All things considered, it is clear that cultural heritage can be benefited from the development of cultural tourism. However, people should also take great precautions against all potential problems caused by the development.
This writing is found under the following category(ies):
Agree or Disagree